- Ashley Kenneth A.C.T_B42Late
Airline Crashes Truth
Movement
- Gary Lambert
S.I.N.A.O.M
Safety Is Not An Option
Movement.
Joint Statement 001 on 11 March 2014
- Actual time of MH370 departure. We have received
information that MH370 departed at 00:27 MYT and not 00:41 MYT as
reported by MAS and all mainstream media. If MAS could not even get
it right with a simple matter of checking its own online system, can
we trust other more important information given out by MAS? MAS
media statement was issued at 07:24 MYT, 7 hours after departure.
Definitely more than sufficient time to check.
- MAS originally stated MH370 lost contact with Subang Air
Traffic Control (SATC) at 02:40MYT. After
some obvious position-speed-time discrepancies, a spokesman
confirmed the last contact took place at 01:30 MYT between flight
crew and SATC, but reiterated the plane did not vanish from the SATC
system until 0240 MYT. Latest revision: MH370 was last seen by radar
at 0122MYT and last heard on radio at 0130MYT. Why did MAS
intentionally delay the “loss of radar” and last radio contact
to 0240 MYT?
- Last Radio Contact after loss of radar signal.
A pilot of an earlier Boeing 777 plane flying into Vietnam airspace,
bound for Narita Japan, was asked to assist in contacting the
missing MH370 after it went off-radar at 0122MYT. The pilot managed
to make radio contact but there was a lot of static interference. He
could not make out the “mumbling” from the missing MH370 before
loosing the emergency radio connection at 0130 MYT. Why is this not
given due investigation in preference to other wild goose chases?
- Why did it take MAS and the Malaysian government more than
6 hours, to make the public announcement of an obviously lost plane?
An earlier public alert could
have initiated the Search And Rescue (SAR) much earlier to save
possible survivors, no matter how remote. More than 24 hours later,
the acting Transport Minister still ruled out the possibility of a
crash, just because the crash site had not been located yet. Not
prioritising and NOT ruling out any possibilities,
even the highly improbable ones like pilot suicide or cooperative
hijacking, the Minister is spreading out valuable resources too thin
within the crucial hours of likely survival or successful recovery.
“Jack of all trades but master of none.”
- Crash debris field found 520 km north-east of the Last
Contact Location (LCL). With the discovery of the plane's
window/door, about 92 km off the coast of Vietnam (108 miles from Ho
Chi Minh City), it appears that MH370 deviated 18 to 19 degrees off
its normal flight route above HCMC. It takes about 47 seconds for a
debris to free fall from 35,000ft to ground. With an assumed sudden
explosion at the maximum cruising speed of 0.84 Mach or 639 mph, the
maximum lateral displacement thereafter, can be calculated to be
13.4 km or 8.3 miles. This fact and the last emergency radio contact
8 minutes after the lost radar signal at 0122MYT, confirm no
immediate explosion near LCL.
- Facts confirming NO immediate explosion near LCL. All
modern airlines are equipped with multiple tracking devices. Both
Boeing and MAS have refused to confirm if the missing plane had a
transponder or other radar-detecting equipment installed. Strange
refusal indeed.
Rolls Royce, the manufacturer of the two Trent 800 engines on the missing jetliner, confirmed it tracks all of its engines at its control centre in Britain. Rolls Royce also confirm they would know first hand if there is something wrong with the engine or any kind of problems. Boeing also has the ability to track all of its aircraft anywhere in the world in real time. Thus, the possibility that the jetliner is still largely intact (flying or otherwise) is very very slim unless Boeing or Rolls Royce are in the game of playing hide and seek and not disclosing the truth at this crucial period of time.
An instantaneous catastrophic explosion could knock out all radio and electronic tracking devices at once. But it would also mean a debris field of 15 km radius at the point of lost contact (LCL). MAS and the Malaysian government should have dispatched air reconnaissance within hours of the abnormal but significant “loss of total contact” especially if the emergency radio contact by the other MH flight to Narita, Japan, was also strangely cut off with high static noise. It would have confirmed the negative possibility of a mid-air explosion at the LCL itself.
This means the missing plane must have travelled considerable distance and time without any radio or electronic detection. This also rules out any hijacking (cooperative or otherwise) or pilot suicide crash as they could not shut down the in-built electronic tracking devices even if they maintained radio silence.
The only way, the missing plane could travel a distance of 507 km for 29.5 minutes at cruising speed or slower before total disintegration, is for all electronic controls to be FRIED as in an EMP attack. The jet engines would still be running. At this time, the runaway jetliner is virtually a “rocket” with 239 “passenger” onboard. It must be hell as the technical crew (pilot incl) could do nothing but pray for more than 30 minutes or longer.
That is the only way the missing plane could have travelled that distance or time with no radar detection or radio contact?
- Irresponsible MAS & Inept Malaysian government
emergency response. Alternatively, even without knowing the
crash location, absence of emergency tracking or radio contact, MAS
need not wait and hope that by some miracles, the “lost plane”
could somehow land safely at Beijing. That would be totally naïve
wishful thinking. The entire MAS management should be sacked and
charged for criminal misconduct. What were they thinking? Six hours
of no communication and radar detection. Still denying the plane had
crashed at a presser more than 9 hours later. Were MAS trying to
rescue survivors or denying their paying customers the right to
survive?
- Why are some elements of the mainstream media, Transport,
Defence and Security Ministries, irresponsibly promoting unfounded
ridiculous theories and widening the SAR area, instead of focusing
on the most probable? Obvious, the big elephant in the room was
totally ignored.
The one and only one probable cause of an “instant total” breakdown of all communication and electronic devices and no immediate explosion in the vicinity of LCL, is an EMP attack. An EMP attack specifically targeted on MH370 and not any other jetliners in the busy air route. The EMP attack could be delivered by a laser weapon on a stealth vehicle (stealth drone, plane, vessel or submarine). Although the destruction of the jetliner may not be immediate like a missile hit, it would jam all electronic devices from communicating to the air-control system or giving any kind of distress signals. The crew would have no control at all. That would explain why MH370 could travel another 507 km for more than 30 minutes, without giving any distress calls. It would also explain the mysterious “turn-back” detected by the Defense Radar system. It wasn't MH370 turning back but the “interference” of the laser beams.
- If MH370 was the target of an EMP attack, there must be huge global-local issues and motives. Obviously, there are plenty. They will be detailed out in future joint statements by A.C.T. B42Late and S.I.N.A.O.M.
- Innocent civilians should not be used as Human Shields or
Human Sacrifices for any commercial, political, religious or racial
motives. We demand an end to all drone strikes, fracking, EMP
space weapons, climate change geo-engineering and any induced
natural calamities (earthquakes, hurricanes, typhoons, droughts,
abnormal blizzards, floods etc) or mega-accidents. Our prayers and
condolences to all the relatives, friends and loved ones of the
MH370 victims on this 3rd Anniversary of the Fukushima Nuclear
disaster.
attachment:
code no: ACT20140312112629 GE Last location Debris SAR
code no: ACT20140312105113 US laser weapons
code no: ACT20140312112629 GE Last location Debris SAR
code no: ACT20140312105113 US laser weapons
No comments:
Post a Comment