Wednesday, 30 July 2014

So predictable of MH370 coverup: Poisoning the well whenever something more credible crop up in South China Sea

Why do you think they always poison the well with nonsensical distractions whenever some credible evidence of the true crash in South China Sea surface? 

Credible evidence of the MH370 crash (the oil slicks, the floating debris) though less than a normal mid-air explosion would still be there hours after the crash. The MH370 crash was unusual as it was deliberately shot down (vaporised) by USN (US Navy) testing out their latest DEW laser weaponry in the Feb-March battle drills in the South China Sea. The physics and maths fit so well, there could not be any other explanation for the mysterious "undetected mid-air crash". 

So when the first independent Vietnamese renaissance flights picked up miles of oil slicks at 2 major spots (other minor ones) and later confirmed by the Royal Singapore Air Force (RSAF), the Malaysian Idiot Authorities (MIA) quickly dismissed the oil as "normal" oil slicks from unknown sources but not from the most likely source of the day .....the MH370 crash. The MIA took some oil samples near the coast of Peninsula Malaysia and quickly "declared the oil did not come from the missing plane". They were right in that spin. There were no photos showing the operation where the oil samples were collected from the miles long oil slicks at the suspected trails to the final crash location. There had been no further investigation into the source of the oil slicks. Very strange indeed. Unlike the CIA and Mossad who had decades of covering up inside jobs from the Titanic to 911 and to more recent Sandy Hook/Boston Bombing; the MIA is virtually inexperienced mega-sabotage false flags. The best they had was May13 in 1969 where the racial massacre of innocent Chinese Malaysians were again feebly blamed on the opposition party leaders like Lim Kit Siang. He was alleged to have pissed on the UMNO flag in Kuala Lumpur that started the riot. He was in fact in Sabah, more than 1,500 km away from KL.

This and many other feeble attempts to divert attention away from the real crash scene in South China Sea, substantiate our belief that MH370 had indeed crashed in the South China Sea.

So before this story (by Tim Ackers) started to gain traction, they invented the "Iphone in the Ass" story. A blank photo was allegedly taken and sent from Diego Garcia by Philip Wood. That was debunked as the photo and phone message was sent from a time zone UTC
(Philip Wood and his girlfriend exposed as crisis actors in the Boston Marathon false flag bombing)   together with

They (the CIA - Coverup International Assholes) had to quickly announce that a debris had washed ashore in the western coast of Australia. That was just to hold our attention until the Tim Ackers' story is forgotten. When it did not, they then introduce the GeoResonance's discovery that the plane was largely intact and submerged in the Bay of Bengal.  

IS THIS MH370'S TAIL? Now UK scientist 'sights' debris painted in MAS colors in area flagged up by US pilot

    MH17 - another Gulf of Tongkin in Ukraine

    Amin says:
    July 29, 2014 at 8:03 am
    the location (distance, angle wrt to flight path, time, altitude) of the crash scene at Hrabove does not line with the “explosion point” at 1:20pm (exact coord). So the crash scene at Hrabove is definitely a staged crash site.
    Graham says:
    July 29, 2014 at 10:51 am
    When an aircraft is travelling at around 500 knots and gets directly hit by a missile, or suffers from the shock wave of a missile detonating within 60 feet or more, would the resulting aircraft “debris” end up having “zero forward velocity” and simply plummet to the ground vertically above the “explosion point”?
    -edited by Ashley K.

    Our answer:
    The answer to Graham question is obviously NO. Now who would ask such a silly question?

    No matter what, there is still the forward momentum. The time taken to fall from an altitude of 33,000ft (10km) would be 45.4 sec. (SQRT((2*ht)/g). The max horizontal speed would be the last cruising speed which was 490 knots. 

    In reality, the speed decreases immediately after dis-integration due to drag and loss of momentum. For ease in calculation, we use a constant velocity (490 knots) to calculate the maximum distance. Further the heaviest and strongest parts of the plane like the engine, would be flung off the furthest distance from the point of explosion. On ground, the engine turbine would generally mark the upper limit of the debris zone, save for a few odd small projectile fragments. All things considered, the maximum distance for MH17 should be 7.1149 miles or 11.45km. To be on the safe side, the conical-shape debris field on ground, would span a couple of km to max 13 km with an angular swathe of  <10 to 60 deg. (assumptions used in lieu of field parameters). 

    Thus, anyone (e.g Stew Webb) suggesting a debris field stretching 30 miles in diameter, would not be talking about a single instantaneous explosion-disintegration event (within milliseconds) but rather a slow dis-integration process (lasting secs to probably a few minutes) i.e bits of the aircraft falling off while the main engines powered on until the main dis-integration event. 

    Note: In MH370, the Boeing 777 (reg 9M-MRO) travelled for another 507 km or 30 minutes after the Last Contact location (LCL), before it was finally vaporised (est. 80%) 92 km off the coast of Vietnam.  DEW-laser can operate at many energy level and frequencies. The targeted plane is continuously tracked with non-lethal beams as soon as it comes within range. Dew-laser (as with all electromagnetic frequency devices) don't work well under thunderstorm or unstable sky conditions. For that reason MH370 shot-down was chosen in the mid-night or early hours of the day as mid-day in the Equator are prone to thunderstorm showers. MH17 9M-MRD was shot down at 1:20 pm at Lat 47 deg, in clear blue sky.  DEW-Laser can also be used to shoot down a plane without vaporising it as shown in the video.

    You can watch an illustration of the DEW-Laser system at

    Unlike larger laser systems that have the power to vaporize targets, the LaWS system will be used to blur the vision of UAVs and missiles and throw them off a ship’s tracks. Although primarily a countermeasure, the LaWS does pack enough of a punch to do some real damage to small boats and drones, igniting outboard fuel reserves and, in one demonstration, setting a stealth drone’s airframe alight.

    Look at the Big Picture, the plane view.
    Leaving aside the mode of destruction for the time being, it is obvious that the ground position of all debris including the plane's fuselage or wrecks,  should always be ahead (in the heading of the aircraft) of the “explosion point” by at least a km to a max of 12 km (depending on the altitude of detachment from the main fuselage). In simple terms, no debris should fall backwards (aft of) the explosion point. This is not speculation but a scientific fact. Refer to the following map.

    According flt data log, of the last 7 minutes from 1:13 to 1:20pm (local time), the last radar contact (LRC) was at 1:20pm, 5.8 km south of the “staged crash site ASCS1” at Hrabove. See the diagram in Planted crash scene confirmed by Airbus satellite photos & laws of physics.

    The reported crash site at Hrabrove had to be preplanned and prestaged. It is no coincidence the Staged Crash site was staged in an abandoned building lot right at the road junction for easy access. It would be easy to detonate a fireball on a debris dump at the time of crash and to video it from afar without seeing the burning dump. There are many more evidence for our assertion but the main reason for staging a crash scene ….. MH17 was downed by a DEW Laser weapon, not a missile.

    The most important question is, "why was the crash site (ASCS1) at Hrabove staged so far (3-5km) off the 117 deg flight path? Couldn't they have staged it between Snizhne – Torez (where the debris actually fell)? 

    It is really the case of “moving the mountain or the road”. Staged crash sites cannot be moved at the last minute without exposing the plot. This also answers the often asked question, “why did flt MH17 deviated from past 10 flight paths to an obvious danger zone”? Ukraine ATC were in fact complicit in guiding MH17 into the “mouse trap” at Hrabove. It can be seen from our first compilation, flt MH17 was heading 108.5 deg from 1:13-1:15pm. If it continued, the plane would be too far north (by 5km) of the staged crash site (ASCS1) at Hrabove.

    There was an urgent last minute course correction between 1:15 – 1:17pm, to get into the preplanned flight path (112 deg) heading directly to Hrabove. Unlike a car, the plane takes tens of seconds to minutes, to stabilise on a new course. By 1:17pm, it was clear that the new corrected course at 117.71 deg (not by design, but perhaps Divine Intervention?) was too far south (3-5 km) of Hrabove. The last radar contact was preplanned at 1:17pm with the “purported crash explosion” a minute after. In the original flight plan heading 112 deg to Hrabrove, a mid-air explosion at 33,000ft (10km) would fit in nicely with the planted debris at Rozsypne, a few km before Hrabove, the main engine crash site. 

    But things don't always go exactly to plan. At the over-corrected course (117 deg) an explosion at 1:18pm would certainly raise more question. It was simply too far behind the staged crash site at Hrabrove. A nail biting moment for those in command at DEW-Laser weapon control centre. 

    To beam or not to beam, Scott?

    Failure was not an option as they could not have a second chance with this premeditated crash, not within the week anyway. As they were debating on the issues, another precious minute passed by. 

    Finally they decided to press the red button. Hence the delay in last radar contact until 1:20pm. By then the “fabricated explosion point” was way past Hrabrove and heading towards the heavily populated Snizhne area ahead. At best, the DEW-laser weaponry can vaporise 80% of a fast moving airline. Odd sharp edge debris speeding above 300 knots, are just as lethal as shrapnels from a bomb. 

    Not that the Kabal value the lives of the local civilians. They are more afraid of the wide press publicity and open protests of local population fatalities. While they can suppress and hide the discoveries of “real MH17 debris”, local fatalities would throw wide open the 2 sets of crash pattern (one real and one staged).

    Unique to DEW-laser weaponry, the tail fins or wings of the plane can be "burned off" selectively, to drastically alter the course of the fast descending plane. That is the reason main scattered debris (20% of normal crash) zone is about 30deg off the straight 117deg course, into the lesser populated zone between Torez and Snizhne. 

    Compared with the 1988 PAM103 at Lockerbie where 11 locals were killed and dozens of houses destroyed, this MH17 crash emerged with no local fatalities, no real house damage (except those staged as well) and most important of all, no major crash crater. BTW Lockerbie was downed by an explosion within the plane at 31,000ft (9.4km). 

    Bomb within MH17 or external missile hit can never explain the strange flight path of MH17 before crashing. For those who had been overly critical of the DEW-Laser downing of MH370 and MH17 (without basis, of course), it might interest you to know that the US-released satellite photos accusing Russia of x-border shelling, showed the fabricated shelled area to be on the same flight course of MH17 (117 deg). If everything else fails, the US-Kabal military intelligence was on standby, to suggest the missiles might have come from Russian artillery/missile fire. That is how desperate they are, to suck Russian into triggering a WWIII.

    Tuesday, 29 July 2014

    US intelligence shot itself in the foot with the fake PS satellite evidence

    - by Jane Doe.

    Courtesy of US State Department

    by RT

    'Fake': Russian Defence Min rebuffs US sat image claims
    Published time: July 28, 2014 11:29
    Edited time: July 28, 2014 12:25

    Russia’s Defense Ministry has stated that “fake” satellite images of alleged shelling of Ukraine from Russian territory were created by US counselors “with close links to Ukraine’s Security Council.”

    The authenticity of the images is impossible to prove, the ministry added.

    The Defense Ministry stated that the images posted by the US ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt on his Twitteraccount, allegedly proving the shelling of Ukraine from Russian territory, are “fake,” ITAR-TASS reports.

    “These materials were posted to Twitter not by accident, as their authenticity is impossible to prove – due to the absence of the attribution to the exact area, and an extremely low resolution. Let alone using them as ‘photographic evidence’,” Igor Konashenkov, the official representative of the ministry, stated.

    “Pictures” like this, the general continued, “have also been provided by Kiev representatives as an excuse for the usage of heavy artillery and other weaponry by the Ukrainian army – against the country’s civilian population.”

    “Last Friday, Ukrainian Defense Minister Valery Geletey again tried to add a sensational side to photo collages like this in the Ukrainian media – in vain. But on Sunday, the US ambassador to the Ukraine joined in, posting those satellite images on his Twitter page, which secured him the attention of the loyal Ukrainian media,” the Russian ministry said.

    This scheme is called “an informational merry-go-round,” Konashenkov added, using an expression commonly uttered in Russia relating to feeding the information to the media.

    “It’s no secret to anyone that fakes like this are made by a group of US counselors staying in the Kiev building of the Security Council, led by General Randy Kee,” he noted.

    The general outlined the cycle as follows: the US counselors in the Kiev feed the disinformation to the Ukrainian media, with the news being taken by the Washington official representatives and presented as statements.

    Afterwards, the Ukrainian media cite the US authorities and publish articles like as “objective.”

    NO It can be proven
    Even my 5-yr old can say it is a fake.  Here are the reasons:

    1. See the US-issued satellite photos in response to Russia's demand for evidence. US and NATO had been making baseless accusations for the last months. The baseless accusations intensified picked up after the false flag MH17 tragedy.  The proofs are in the PS (photoshopped) satellite photos themselves. 

    2. Why would Russia shell regions under pro-Russian separatists control? It is like shooting yourself in the foot. The fact is, pro-Russian separatists controlled regions had been shelled by Kiev US-Nazi regime military. There is hardly any published press reports of Kiev-controlled territories shelled by Russia or even pro-Russian separatists. What are the Kiev-controlled military doing in Pro-Russian controlled territories?

    3. See the satellite photos on 20 July and 23 July below. The top 2 were untouched. Compare the mid-tone enhanced (balanced) images below. First note the forested vegetation. The top right was cleverly covered by the location map. But the left edge shows that the vegetation is more lush in just 3 days? Obviously trees / bushes don't grow that fast.  There are definitely more days (in not weeks in between the 2 satellite photos). 

    figure 1. 

    4. Next look at the double-track marks in the open field. Shelling don't and can't erase/change the existing tracks especially where it has not been hit. Entire length of tracks seem to have vanished. Spot some of the more obvious differences (nos 1 - 5). 

    5. Nope. The vanished tracks are not due to scale, contrast or color intensity factors. You can confirm by comparing the visible tracks on both photos. In fact, there should have been more tracks on the 23 July photo and not the other way round. This could only mean that the "shelled craters" had been PS (photoshopped) into an earlier satellite photo.      

    6. Now why didn't they use the same satellite photo? Adding the "PS shelled craters" would seem too obvious it was a fake PS job. They wanted the background to be slightly different to quell speculation of faking the satellite photos. It is quite possible both photos were taken much earlier and they do not have a later photo after the Kiev military moved out. It would have been unrealistic to show Kiev military units still in place after the shelling. Thus, an earlier photo before the deployment or at the commencement of the Kiev military units had to be used.  Simple deduction shows the "simplistic thinking of the photoshop culprits". Smart in virtual computer games but not at all in practical military ways. 

    7. Next notice that the "shelled craters" are all too symmetrical as if they had all fallen vertically to the ground. Russia was just tens of km away, across the border. If the shelling had been from Russian's side of border, the real shell craters would be skewed. Prominent convex deep head end with a shallower tapering tail. The head-tail (shooting direction) would have been west-easterly ie. NW-SE depending on the shooting direction. 

    figure 2.

    8. In the second satellite evidence (figure 2) titled "Artillery Strikes within Ukraine", the US intelligence claimed the Russian's self-propelled artillery (area R) had been used to strike Ukrainian military units (area U) within Ukraine. The satellite photo is distorted (at different angle) with respect to (wrt) the Google Earth image. Nevertheless we managed to scale them to within 10% accuracy and angular distortion.

    9. Why would the Russian military waste their military strikes on an empty farm land?  The nearest town of Dyakove is about 3 to 6 km to the north-west of the strike area.

    10.  As with bullet ballistics, the pattern of individual and composite craters can indicate the direction of the shell batteries. The red lines show that the artillery fires were shot from the south-west, some 3.5 to 5.5 km  west of the reported fire zone (R). In the corrected google map, the direction of fire is 14 to 18 deg in error. In the distorted satellite photos released by US Intelligence, the error in direction of fire is 21-24 deg.

    11.  Although minute details on both the fire (R) and target (U) zones can be matched with the google maps, there are disturbing discrepancies. In the U area, a noticeable "buried" topographic feature in the farm land is not seen in the satellite photo. It could have been inadvertently masked by the overlying layers during the photoshop process.

    12. The actual size of the detailed overlay is incorrectly shown in the satellite photo for area U. The vegetated hedges at the edge of the field however lined up perfectly. This again suggest photoshop bloopers in the rush job.

    13. The detailed overlay for the Russian Fire Zone (R) bears no resemblance to the actual ground topography. The 2 branches of river (well vegetated edges) should have appear in the detailed overly R. There was none. The power lines with prominent pylons should have passed thru area R. The detailed overlay R instead shows horizontal lines of farm land with increasing undulations across the centre of the rectangular area to the southern edge. On the google map, the major irregularities should cut across the northern section from west to east.

    14. Figure 2, shows that the satellite photo released by the US Intelligence accusing Russia of cross border artillery strikes into Ukraine is total PS fabrication.

    15. Additional analyses show that the power lines with pylons would have crossed the array of artillery units with at least one unit near a pylon.

    figure 3 

    16. What are the chances the strike zone (U) lies on the MH17 flight path heading 117.71 deg?

    17. Incidentally, the location of MH17 tragedy lies on ZEAD (Zionist Evil Axis of Disaster) joining the 2014 Feb 11 Lockhead C130 plane crash,  20130116 BP Algeria Plant Hostage crisis, 20090601 Air France flt AF447 in the mid Atlantic. The same ZEAD passes close by the potential Senkaku flash point (island dispute between China & Japan).  Too many coincidences. It had to be a MIHOP accident.

    figure 4

     ( be updated periodically with new photo analyses......) 

    Monday, 28 July 2014

    MAS MH17: Who Stands to Gain?

    By Chandra Muzaffar
    Global Research, July 27, 2014

    The Russian military has released military monitoring data which challenge allegations circulating in the media pertaining to the MH 17 crash in the Donetsk Region of Eastern Ukraine on July 17 2014. Questions have been raised about Kiev military jets tracking MH 17, Ukrainian air traffic controllers and the deployment of Buk missile systems. Kiev should also release military data on the circumstances leading to the crash. So should the Pentagon which reportedly has relevant intelligence and satellite data.

    Since military data is hardcore information, Kiev and Washington should be persuaded to be transparent and accountable. The UN Secretary-General can play a role in this since there is a specialized agency within the UN, the ICAO, dedicated to international civil aviation. Military data from Moscow, Kiev and Washington should be scrutinized by the independent international panel that is supposed to probe the MH 17 catastrophe.

    Such data carries much more weight than videos purportedly revealing the role of the pro-Russian rebels and the Russian government in the crash. One such video showing a Buk system being moved from Ukraine to Russia is a fabrication. The billboard in the background establishes that it was shot in a town — Krasnoarmeisk — that has been under the control of the Ukrainian military since May 11. Similarly, a You Tube video showing a Russian General and Ukrainian rebels discussing their role in mistakenly downing a civilian aircraft was, from various tell-tale signs, produced before the event.

    The public should be wary of fabricated “evidence” of this sort, after what we have witnessed in the last so many years. Have we forgotten the monstrous lies and massive distortions that accompanied the reckless allegation that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction (WMD) which led eventually to the invasion of that country in 2003 and the death of more than a million people? Iraq continues to bleed to this day. What about the Gulf of Tonkin episode of 1964 which again was a fabrication that paved the way for wanton US aggression against Vietnam that resulted in the death of more than 3 million Vietnamese? The “babies in incubators” incident in Kuwait in 1990 was yet another manufactured lie that aroused the anger of the people and served to justify the US assault on Iraq. Just last year we saw how an attempt was made by some parties to pin the blame for a sarin gas attack in Ghouta, Syria upon the Assad government when subsequent investigations have revealed that it was the work of some militant rebel group.

    From Tonkin to Ghouta there is a discernible pattern when it comes to the fabrication of evidence to justify some nefarious agenda or other. As soon as the event occurs before any proper investigation has begun, blame is apportioned upon the targeted party. This is done wilfully to divert attention from the real culprit whose act of evil remains concealed and camouflaged. The colluding media then begins to spin the “correct” version with the help of its reporters and columnists who concoct “fact” out of fiction. Any other explanation or interpretation of the event is discredited and dismissed derisively to ensure that the “credibility” of the dominant narrative remains intact. As the narrative unfolds, the target often embodied in a certain personality is demonized to such a degree that he arouses the ire of the public and becomes an object of venom.

    The pattern described here is typical of what is known as a “false flag” operation in which blame for some dastardly deed is consciously transferred to one’s adversary. It has happened right through history and many contemporary nation-states — and not just the United States — are guilty of flying false flags.

    To protect ourselves from being deceived by such operations, the general public should always ask: who stands to gain from a particular episode? Cui Bono is in fact an important principle in the investigation of a crime. In the case of the MH 17 carnage, the pro-Russian rebels do not benefit in any way from downing a civilian airliner. Their goal is independence from the Kiev government which is why they are fighting Kiev through sometimes violent means including shooting down its military planes. Massacring 298 passengers in a flight from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur does not serve their cause. Moscow which backs the rebels to an extent also gains nothing from involving itself in such a diabolical carnage.

    10 days after the carnage, it is now clear who is trying to reap benefits from that terrible tragedy in the skies. The demonization of the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, orchestrated from various Western capitals, including Kiev, after Crimea voted to join the Russian Federation, thus thwarting one of the primary strategic goals of NATO’s eastward expansion, has now reached its pinnacle. After MH 17, it has become a lot easier to convince people— even without an iota of evidence — that Putin is a “mass murderer”. The tarnishing of Putin’s image is crucial for those in the West who want to curb Russia’s political re-assertion so that the US and its allies can perpetuate their global dominance without hindrance.

    MH 17 has helped the elite in Washington in yet another sense. It has strengthened its push for tougher sanctions against Russia which began after the Crimea vote. Given their extensive economic ties with Russia, many European countries such as Germany, France, Netherlands and Italy have been somewhat lukewarm about widening and deepening sanctions. But will that change now? Will an outraged European public, incensed by the MH 17 massacre, demand that their governments punish Moscow?

    It is obvious that those who seek to punish Russia and the pro-Russian rebels, namely, the elite in Washington and Kiev, are poised to gain the most from the MH 17 episode. Does it imply that they would have had a role in the episode itself? Only a truly independent and impartial international inquiry would be able to provide the answer.

    In this regard, we must admit that while elites in Kiev and Washington may stand to gain from MH 17, those who actually pulled the trigger may be some other group or individual with links to the powerful in the two capitals. It is quite conceivable that a certain well-heeled individual equipped with the appropriate military apparatus and with access to air-control authorities in the region may have executed the act of evil itself.

    Because of who he is, and where his loyalties lie, that individual may have also decided to target Malaysia. Was he giving vent to his anger over our principled stand on the question of justice for the Palestinians? Was he also attempting to divert public attention from Israel’s ground offensive against Gaza which time-wise coincided with the downing of the Malaysian airliner?

    As we explore MH 17 from this angle, would we be able to connect the dots between MH 17 and MH 370, between July 17 and March 8, 2014?

    We should not rest till the whole truth is known and the evil behind these two colossal catastrophes punished severely.

    We owe this to every soul who perished on those fateful flights.

    This article is dedicated to the cherished memory of all those on MH 17 — especially the 80 children who were on board.

    Dr. Chandra Muzaffar is a prominent Malaysian scholar and author, President of the International Movement for a Just World (JUST).

    Monday, 21 July 2014

    What happened to the Malaysian Airliner? by Paul Craig Roberts

    Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:46AM GMT
    By Paul Craig Roberts
    Washington’s propaganda machine is in such high gear that we are in danger of losing the facts that we do have.
    One fact is that the separatists do not have the expensive Buk anti-aircraft missile system or the trained personnel to operate it.
    Another fact is that the separatists have no incentive to shoot down an airliner and neither does Russia. Anyone can tell the difference between low-flying attack aircraft and an airliner at 33,000 feet.
    The Ukrainians do have Buk anti-aircraft missile systems, and a Buk battery was operational in the region and deployed at a site from which it could have fired a missile at the airliner.
    Just as the separatists and the Russian government have no incentive to shoot down an airliner, neither does the Ukrainian government nor, one would think, even the crazed extreme Ukrainian nationalists who have formed militias to take the fight against the separatists that the Ukrainian army is not keen to undertake–unless there was a plan to frame Russia.
    One Russian general familiar with the weapon system offered his opinion that it was a mistake made by the Ukrainian military untrained in the weapon’s use. The general said that although Ukraine has a few of the weapons, Ukrainians have had no training in their use in the 23 years since Ukraine separated from Russia. The general thinks it was an accident due to incompetence.
    This explanation makes a certain amount of sense and far more sense than Washington’s propaganda. The problem with the general’s explanation is that it does not explain why the Buk anti-aircraft missile system was deployed near or in a separatist territory. The separatists have no aircraft. It seems odd for Ukraine to have an expensive missile system in an area in which it is of no military use and where the position could be overrun and captured by separatists.
    As Washington, Kiev, and the presstitute media are committed to the propaganda that Putin did it, we are not going to get any reliable information from the US media. We will have to figure it out for ourselves.
    One way to begin is to ask: Why was the missile system where it was? Why risk an expensive missile system by deploying it in a conflict environment in which it is of no use? Incompetence is one answer, and another is that the missile system did have an intended use.
    What intended use? News reports and circumstantial evidence provide two answers. One is that the ultra-nationalist extremists intended to bring down Putin’s presidential airliner and confused the Malaysian airliner with the Russian airliner.
    The Interfax news agency citing anonymous sources, apparently air traffic controllers, reported that the Malaysian airliner and Putin’s airliner were traveling almost the identical route within a few minutes of one another. Interfax quotes its source: “I can say that Putin’s plane and the Malaysian Boeing intersected at the same point and the same echelon. That was close to Warsaw on 330-m echelon at the height of 10,100 meters. The presidential jet was there at 16:21 Moscow time and the Malaysian aircraft at 15:44 Moscow time. The contours of the aircrafts are similar, linear dimensions are also very similar, as for the coloring, at a quite remote distance they are almost identical.”
    I have not seen an official Russian denial, but according to news reports, the Russian government in response to the Interfax news report said that Putin’s presidential plane no longer flies the Ukraine route since the outbreak of hostilities.
    Before we take the denial at face value, we need to be aware that the implication that Ukraine attempted to assassinate the president of Russia implies war, which Russia wants to avoid. It also implies Washington’s complicity as it is highly unlikely that Washington’s puppet in Kiev would risk such a dangerous act without Washington’s backing. The Russian government, being intelligent and rational, would obviously deny reports of an attempted assassination of the Russian president by Washington and its Kiev puppet. Otherwise, Russia has to do something about it, and that means war.
    The second explanation is that the extremists who operate outside the official Ukrainian military, hatched a plot to down an airliner in order to cast the blame on Russia. If such a plot occurred, it likely originated with the CIA or some operative arm of Washington and was intended to force the EU to cease resisting Washington’s sanctions against Russia and to break off Europe’s valuable economic relationships with Russia. Washington is frustrated that its sanctions are unilateral, unsupported by its NATO puppets or any other countries in the world except possibly the lap-dog British PM.
    There is considerable circumstantial evidence in support of this second explanation. There is the youtube video which purports to be a conversation between a Russian general and separatists who are discussing having mistakenly brought down a civilian airliner. According to reports, expert examination of the code in the video reveal that it was made the day before the airliner was hit.
    Another problem with the video is that whereas we could say that separatists conceivably could confuse an airliner at 33,000 feet with a military attack plane, the Russian military would not. The only conclusion is that by involving the Russian military, the video doubly discredited itself.
    The circumstantial evidence easiest for non-technical people to understand is the on cue news programs organized to put the blame on Russia prior to the knowledge of any facts.
    I have already reported on the BBC news report which I heard and which was obviously primed to place all blame on Russia. The program ended with a BBC correspondent breathlessly reporting that he has just seen the youtube video and that the video is the smoking gun that proved Russia did it. There is no longer any doubt, he said. Somehow the information got on a video and on youtube before it reached the Ukrainian government or Washington.
    The evidence that Putin did it is a video made prior to the attack on the airliner. The entire BBC report aired over National Public Radio was orchestrated for the sole purpose of establishing prior to any evidence that Russia was responsible.
    Indeed the entire Western media spoke as one: Russia did it. And the presstitutes are still speaking the same way.
    Possibly, this uniform opinion merely reflects the pavlovian training of the Western media to automatically line up with Washington. No media source wants to be subject to criticism for being unamerican or to find itself isolated by majority opinion, which carries the day, and earn black marks for being wrong. As a former journalist for, and contributor to, America’s most important news publications, I know how this works.
    On the other hand, if we discount the pavlovian conditioning, the only conclusion is that the entire news cycle pertaining to the downing of the Malaysian airliner is orchestrated in order to lay the blame on Putin.
    Romesh Ratnesar, deputy editor of Bloomberg Businessweek, provides convincing evidence for orchestration in his own remarks of July 17. Ratnesar’s opinion title is: “The Malaysia Airlines Shootdown Spells Disaster for Putin.” Ratnesar does not mean that Putin is being framed-up. He means that prior to Putin having the Malaysian airliner shot down, “to the vast majority of Americans, Russia’s meddling in Ukraine has largely seemed of peripheral importance to U.S. interests. That calculus has changed. . . . It may take months, even years, but Putin’s recklessness is bound to catch up to him. When it does, the downing of MH 17 may be seen as the beginning of his undoing.”
    As a former Wall Street Journal editor, anyone who handed me a piece of shit like Ratnesar published would have been fired. Look at the insinuations when there is no evidence to support them. Look at the lie that Washington’s coup is “Russia’s meddling in Ukraine.” What we are witnessing is the total corruption of Western journalism by Washington’s imperial agenda. Journalists have to get on board with the lies or get run over.
    Look around for still honest journalists. Who are they? Glenn Greenwald, who is under constant attack by his fellow journalists, all of whom are whores. Who else can you think of? Julian Assange, locked away in the Ecuadoran Embassy in London on Washington’s orders. The British puppet government won’t permit free transit to Assange to take up his asylum in Ecuador. The last country that did this was the Soviet Union, which required its Hungarian puppet to keep Cardinal Mindszenty interred in the US Embassy in Budapest for 15 years from 1956 until 1971. Mindszenty was granted political asylum by the United States, but Hungary, on Soviet orders, would not honor his asylum, just as Washington’s British puppet, on Washington’s orders, will not honor Assange’s asylum.
    If we are honest and have the strength to face reality, we will realize that the Soviet Union did not collapse. It simply moved, along with Mao and Pol Pot, to Washington and London.
    The flaw in Putin’s diplomacy is that Putin’s diplomacy relies on good will and on truth prevailing. However, the West has no good will, and Washington is not interested in truth prevailing but in Washington prevailing. What Putin confronts is not reasonable “partners,” but a propaganda ministry aimed at him.
    I understand Putin’s strategy, which contrasts Russian reasonableness with Washington’s threats, but it is a risky bet. Europe has long been a part of Washington, and there are no Europeans in power who have the vision needed to separate Europe from Washington. Moreover, European leaders are paid large sums of money to serve Washington. One year out of office and Tony Blair was worth $50 million dollars.
    After the disasters that Europeans have experienced, it is unlikely that European leaders think of anything other than a comfortable existence for themselves. That existence is best obtained by serving Washington. As the successful extortion of Greece by banks proves, European people are powerless.
    Washington’s propaganda assault against Russia is a double tragedy, because it has diverted attention from Israel’s latest atrocity against the Palestinians locked up in the Gaza Ghetto. Israel claims that its air attack and invasion of Gaza is merely Israel’s attempt to find and close the alleged tunnels through which Palestinian terrorists pour into Israel inflicting carnage. Of course there are no tunnels and no terrorist carnage in Israel.
    One might think that at least one journalist somewhere in the American media would ask why bombing hospitals and civilian housing closes underground tunnels into Israel. But that is too much to ask of the whores that comprise the US media.
    Expect even less from the US Congress. Both the House and Senate have passed resolutions supporting Israel’s slaughter of Palestinians. Two Republicans–the despicable Lindsey Graham and the disappointing Rand Paul–and two democrats–Bob Menendez and Ben Cardin–sponsored the Senate resolution backing Israel’s premeditated murder of Palestinian women and children. The resolution passed the “exceptional and indispensable” people’s Senate unanimously.
    As a reward for its policy of genocide, the Obama regime is immediately transferring $429 million of US taxpayers’ money to Israel to pay for the slaughter.
    Contrast the US government’s support for Israel’s war crimes with the propaganda onslaught against Russia based on lies. We are living all over again “Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction,” “Assad’s use of chemical weapons,” “Iranian nukes.”
    Washington has lied for so long that it can’t do anything else.

    Dr Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. His latest book, The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West is now available. More articles by Dr. Roberts.

    Sunday, 20 July 2014

    MH17- Organised & Planned by KZB, executed by CIA & MOSSAD, blow jobs by MSM Presstitutes.

    - by the Saker

    The last question then.....

    There is an obvious last question which we need to ask: if the Ukies did it, could they have done so without the US knowing about it? The answer, in case anybody had any doubts about this, is absolutely categorically and emphatically not. No way Jose, not this regime, not one which is 110% dependent of, and submitted to, Uncle Sam. In other words, if this was a deliberate Ukie attack, then this really was a deliberate US attack. Not quite a "false flag", but a sneaky dirty trick, a longtime US specialty. The typical US way works like this: organized and planned by Uncle Sam, paid for by the Saudis, executed by the Israelis. At least that is the historical record for US dirty tricks. That is also most likely how 9/11 was done. Why bring in 9/11 several times at the risk of infuriating the doubleplusgoodthinking crowd yet again? No, not just for the heck of it, but to remind everybody that the folks who killed 3000+ people on 9/11 would not hesitate for a nanosecond to kill "only" 300 or so, especially if the risk of getting caught is negligible, which in this case it is. If in the case of 9/11 it is the entire Establishment which by stupidity or by cowardice which was made an accomplice of the crime, in this case the folks who did it will have the support of a rabidly russophobic Establishment which will not care one bit about the truth as long as it allows it to further flame the flames of hatred against Russia.

    A provisional conclusion of sorts - Lasciate Ogni Speranza

    This crime will never be properly investigated nor will the culprits ever be punished for it. Oh sure, there will be plenty of books in the future who will reveal it all in minute details but, as Michel Parenti always reminds us, history is not only written by victors, it is also written by the elites, the oligarchs, the banking establishment, the 1%ers. If anything, 9/11 has proven that our society is completely indifferent to facts and proof. Our society is ruled by ideological dogma and political expediency. In the case of MH17 the accepted dogma is that the Novorussians are the bad guys and the political expediency says that this latest crime cannot be blamed on the "heroic Euro-Ukrainian freedom fighters" or, even less so, on Uncle Sam.

    Just as I wrote this last sentence above, I decided to check my favorite Imperial Mouthpiece and, sure enough, I read this: "US President Barack Obama has said a surface-to-air missile fired from a rebel-held area in east Ukraine brought down Malaysia Airlines flight MH17". See, it is that simple! How needs flight recorders of radar tracks anyway?! If the US President said so, then it is so. Any other interpretation is a criminal delusion bordering on terrorism. Who needs proof when we got both Poroshenko and Obama saying that the Russikies did it?

    I am disgusted beyond words by both of these ugly, evil, clowns.

    Well, I hope that that some of you will have found the exercises above useful, regardless of all my caveats. I wish my recollection of working with air defenses was better and I wish my knowledge was not 25 year old. As always, this is the best I can do and I share it to you, my friends, in the hope to resist the imperial propaganda machine the best I can. If there are those amongst you who have a more recent and possibly more hands-on knowledge of these topics, I beg them to share that knowledge with the rest of us.

    Kind regards and many thanks,

    The Saker

    Western War justice - Guilty before evidence within 24 hrs just like 911 & SH non-existent WMD

    - by Pepe Escobar

    Pepe Escobar is the roving correspondent for Asia Times/Hong Kong, an analyst for RT and TomDispatch, and a frequent contributor to websites and radio shows ranging from the US to East Asia.

    Published time: July 19, 2014 15:29
    Reuters / Maxim Zmeyev

    Reuters / Maxim Zmeyev

    Here’s the spin war verdict: the current Malaysian Airlines tragedy – the second in four months – is “terrorism” perpetrated by “pro-Russian separatists” armed by Russia and Putin is the main culprit. End of story. Anyone who believes otherwise, shut up.

    Why? Because the CIA said so. Because Hillary ‘We came, we saw, he died’ Clinton said so. Because crazy Samantha ‘R2P’ Power said so – thundering at the UN, everything duly printed by the neo-con infested Washington Post.

    Because Anglo-American corporate media – from CNN to Fox (who tried to buy Time Warner, which owns CNN) – said so. Because the President of the United States (POTUS) said so. And mostly because Kiev had vociferously said so in the first place.

    Right off the bat they were all lined up – the invariably hysterical reams of ‘experts’ of the ‘US intelligence community’ literally foaming at their palatial mouths at ‘evil’ Russia and ‘evil’ Putin; intel ‘experts’ who could not identify a convoy of gleaming white Toyotas crossing the Iraqi desert to take Mosul. And yet they have already sentenced; they don’t need to look any further, instantly solving the MH17 riddle.

    It doesn’t matter that President Putin has stressed the MH17 tragedy must be investigated objectively. And‘objectively’ certainly does not mean that fictional ‘international community’ notion construed by Washington – the usual congregation of pliable vassals/patsies.
    And what about Carlos?

    A simple search reveals that MH17 was in fact diverted 200km north from the usual flight path taken by Malaysian Airlines in the previous days – and plunged right in the middle of a war zone. Why? What sort of communication had MH17 received from the Kiev air control tower?

    Kiev has been mute about it. Yet the answer would be simple, had Kiev released the Air Traffic Control recording of the tower talking to flight MH17; Malaysia did it after flight MH370 disappeared forever.

    It won’t happen; SBU security confiscated it. So much for getting an undoctored explanation as to why MH17 was off its path, and what the pilots saw and said before the explosion.

    The Russian Defense Ministry, for its part, has confirmed that a Kiev-controlled Buk anti-aircraft missile battery was operational near the MH17’s crash. Kiev has deployed several batteries of Buk surface-to-air missile systems with at least 27 launchers; these are all perfectly capable of bringing down jets flying at 33,000 ft.

    Radiation from a battery’s Kupol radar, deployed as part of a Buk-M1 battery near Styla [a village some 30km south of Donetsk] was detected by the Russian military. According to the ministry, the radar could be providing tracking information to another battery which was at a firing distance from MH17’s flight path.

    The tracking radar range on the Buk system is a maximum of 50 miles (80km). MH17 was flying at 500mph. So assuming the ‘rebels’ had an operational Buk and did it, they would have had not more than five minutes to scan all the skies above, all possible altitudes, and then lock on. By then they would have known that a cargo plane could not possibly be flying that high.

    For evidence supporting the possibility of a false flag, check here.

    And then there’s the curiouser and curiouser story of Carlos, the Spanish air traffic controller working at Kiev’s tower, who was following MH17 in real time. For some Carlos is legit – not a cipher; for others, he’s never even worked in Ukraine. Anyway he tweeted like mad. His account – not accidentally – has been shut down and he has disappeared. His friends are now desperately looking for him. I managed to read all his tweets in Spanish when the account was still online. And now copies and an English translation are available.
    Russia's President Vladimir Putin.(AFP Photo / Alexei Nikolsky )

    Russia’s President Vladimir Putin.(AFP Photo / Alexei Nikolsky )

    These are some of his crucial tweets:

    “The B777 was escorted by 2 Ukrainian fighter jets minutes before disappearing from radar (5.48pm)”

    “If the Kiev authorities want to admit the truth 2 fighter jets were flying very close a few minutes before the incident but did not shoot down the airliner (5.54)”

    “As soon as the Malaysia Airlines B777 disappeared the Kiev military authority informed us of the shooting down. How did they know? (6.00)”

    “Everything has been recorded on radar. For those that don’t believe it, it was taken down by Kiev; we know that here (in traffic control) and the military air traffic control know it too (7.14)”

    “The Ministry of the Interior did know that there were fighter aircraft in the area, but the Ministry of Defense didn’t. (7.15)”

    “The military confirm that it was Ukraine, but it is not known where the order came from. (7.31)”

    Carlos’s assessment (a partial compilation of his tweets is collected here: the missile was fired by the Ukraine military under orders of the Ministry of Interior – NOT the Ministry of Defense. Security matters at the Ministry of the Interior happen to be under Andrey Paruby, who was closely working alongside US neo-cons and Banderastan neo-Nazis on Maidan.

    Assuming Carlos is legit, the assessment makes sense. The Ukrainian military are divided between Chocolate king [President Petro] Poroshenko – who would like a d├ętente with Russia essentially to advance his shady business interests – and St. Yulia Tymoshenko, who’s on the record advocating genocide of ethnic Russians in eastern Ukraine. US neo-cons and US “military advisers” on the ground are proverbially hedging their bets, supporting both the Poroshenko and Tymoshenko factions.
    So who profits?

    The key question remains, of course, cui bono? Only the terminally brain dead believe shooting a passenger jet benefits the federalists in eastern Ukraine, not to mention the Kremlin.

    As for Kiev, they’d have the means, the motive and the window of opportunity to pull it off – especially after Kiev’s militias have been effectively routed, and were in retreat, in the Donbass. And this after Kiev remained dead set on attacking and bombing the population of eastern Ukraine even from above. No wonder the federalists had to defend themselves.

    And then there’s the suspicious timing. The MH17 tragedy happened two days after the BRICS announced an antidote to the IMF and the World Bank, bypassing the US dollar. And just as Israel ‘cautiously’ advances its new invasion/slow-motion-ethnic-cleansing of Gaza. Malaysia, by the way, is the seat of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission, which has found Israel guilty of crimes against humanity.

    Washington, of course, does profit. What the Empire of Chaos gets in this case is a ceasefire (so the disorganized, battered Kiev militias may be resupplied); the branding of eastern Ukrainians as de facto ‘terrorists’(as Kiev, Dick Cheney-style, always wanted); and unlimited mud thrown over Russia and Putin in particular until Kingdom Come. Not bad for a few minutes’ work. As for NATO, that’s Christmas in July.

    From now on, it all depends on Russian intelligence. They have been surveilling/tracking everything that happens in Ukraine 24/7. In the next 72 hours, after poring over a lot of tracking data, using telemetry, radar and satellite tracking, they will know which type of missile was launched, from where, and even produce communications from the battery that launched it. And they will have access to forensic evidence.

    Unlike Washington – who already knows everything, with no evidence whatsoever (remember 9/11?) – Moscow will take its time to know the basic journalistic facts of what, where, and who, and engage on proving the truth and/or disproving Washington’s spin.

    The historical record shows Washington simply won’t release data if it points to a missile coming from its Kiev vassals. The data may even point to a bomb planted on MH17, or mechanical failure – although that’s unlikely. If this was a terrible mistake by the Novorossiya rebels, Moscow will have to reluctantly admit it. If Kiev did it, the revelation will be instantaneous. Anyway we already know the hysterical Western response, no matter what; Russia is to blame.

    Putin is more than correct when he stressed this tragedy would not have happened if Poroshenko had agreed to extend a ceasefire, as Merkel, Hollande and Putin tried to convince him to do in late June. At a minimum, Kiev is already guilty because they are responsible for safe passage of flights in the airspace they – theoretically – control.

    But all that is already forgotten in the fog of war, tragedy and hype. As for Washington’s hysterical claims of credibility, I leave you with just one number: Iran Air 655.

    The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

    The cover-up of MH17 and MH370 false flags

    - Amin Fasei

    Of course we still have the idiotic cover up responses by the Malaysian Transport Ministry.

    Stupid incompetent idiot took over the Transport Ministry from Najib's cousin after the MH370 fiasco just 2 weeks before another MIHOP tragedy MH17. He said MAS had been flying over Ukraine for >10 years with no problem. Didn't he know that the Ukraine crisis started just this year? Many had made the connection of MIA MH370 to the Ukraine crisis. 10 years ago might be fine but didn't the recent downing of airplanes over the crisis zone change the safety perspective? Yet he could still say there had been no safety warning.

    Still sucking up to Najib over your new post to notice the danger? Sure smells of a false flag ops to draw EU and Russia into an escalated conflict. THINK!

    MSM Presstitutes report:
    PUTRAJAYA: The mission to recover the missing flight MH370 took prominence in the handover of duties at the Transport Ministry between Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein and Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai.

    Liow, who has assumed the position of minister, will waste no time and his first agenda of business would involve communication with his Chinese counterpart as early as Monday night to hold talks on the matter.

    Plans are also being made for a meeting between Liow and Angus Houston, who is coordinating the search and rescue efforts in Australia.
    SEPANG: The route flown by the downed Malaysia Airlines (MAS) flight MH17 was one approved by the International Civil Aviation Authority (ICAO) and had been used by Malaysia Airlines for years, said Transport Minister Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai.
    Liow, who spoke at a press conference at the Sama-Sama Hotel here on Friday denied that MAS had used the route to save on fuel costs.

    "The route was an approved path that had been used for ten years by MAS and other aircraft, and 15 out of 16 Asia-Pacific countries use that route which has been determined by the ICAO. There was nothing informing us that the route should not be used. For many years, we have taken the same route and many other countries have also used the same route. In fact during that time, many other aircraft were using the same route," said Liow.

    Asked if a terrible mistake has been made by allowing MH17 to pass over the Ukraine, Liow reiterated this route was an ICAO approved route and had received no notice not to use the route by the ICAO.

    He repeated this when asked if he would take any responsibility for putting the lives of passengers at risk and for the deaths that occurred.

    The flight path taken by MH17 was approved by the International Civil Aviation Organization, and by the countries whose airspace the route passed through. And the International Air Transportation Association has also stated that the airspace the aircraft was traversing was unrestricted.
    15 out of 16 airlines in the Association of Asia Pacific Airlines fly this route over Ukraine. European airlines also use the same route, and traverse the same airspace. In the hours before the incident, a number of other passenger aircraft from different carriers used the same route.
    There were no last minute instructions given to the pilots of MH17 to change the route of the flight.

    Full article:

    777 Shoot Down Shows CHAFF Deployment; Fighter Jet Involved

    Published on Jul 17, 2014

    The video of a shot down 777 in the Ukraine shows Chaff streamers floating down on to the wreckage site. 

    Chaff is dispensed from military aircraft to obscure an aircraft from RADAR and RADAR guided missiles. The presence of the Chaff indicates something is not right about the story being told.

    IF this is video of the 777 shoot down in Ukraine, it indicates that a military aircraft was involved in the shoot down. This could be anything from a fighter actually shooting down the 777, to a fighter shadowing the 777 and having to launch Chaff to avoid a missile.

    What ever the case, the glittering streamers and specs in the video show that the official story being told is not correct.

    The report below details a substance used by military planes to obscure an aircraft from radar and radar guided missiles called ‘Chaff’…

    Incredibly, this is the ‘evidence’ being touted by Washington and their friends in Kiev, that Russia is to blame for the downing of MH17, a 5 second YouTube video depicting with what appears to be a ‘BUK’ SAM defense system in transit on the back of a truck. Despite US corporate media reporters’ (like CNN’s Andersen Cooper yesterday) insistence that ‘a missile is missing’, there is zero evidence to even suggest that it was used, let alone, used in this explosion…

    Flight MH17 Conjures MH370, Exposing Western Deception, Leading To More Questions

    Shawn Helton

    21stCentury Wire

    There are many questions surrounding the ‘downed’ Malaysian airliner MH17, one must keep their eyes peeled, as the volatile landscape within Ukraine and the Middle East is front and center with regards to this latest high-flying tragedy…

    Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 was apparently bound from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur on Thursday evening and was said to have ‘disappeared’ from radar prior to crashing near the settlement of Grabovo, in Eastern Ukraine’s Donetsk region, with the deaths of all 298 members on the plane, after it was originally stated the count was 295. 

    The human tragedy is incomprehensible, and a very sad ordeal for the victims families. The the potential damage doesn’t end there, however, as Washington and its allies are working overtime to try and establish guilt in the court of public opinion. It’s the type of pretext event which could easily spiral geopolitical rivals further towards a military confrontation in the short term.

    IMAGE: A section of MH17 fuselage on the ground is but one key identifiable piece found in perfect condition, no burn marks or impact damage – without a scratch (Photo: Mashable)
    There seems to be a heavy bias within media reports concerning the ‘doomed’ flight, prompting Russia’s Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov, to lambaste the West for drawing such a quick conclusion, without any verifiable evidence, as told to RT news:

    “They try to show to the whole world that we are responsible for the crash. It is very strange that without any evidence my colleagues from western media would like to find somebody who is responsible for the crash,” Antonov stated. “It seems to me that this is part of information warfare which has been started against the Russian Federation and armed forces.” He also added, “As for me, I don’t want to use this opportunity to blame anybody. I would just like to raise few questions for my colleagues from the armed forces of Ukraine,” Antonov said. “I hope they try to answer the questions, it will be a good opportunity for us to realize where we are, whether there is a possibility for us to restart cooperation and to find who is really responsible for the tragedy.”
    It should also be mentioned that Putin condemned the apparent plane attack when it was first announced, calling for a ceasefire between what Washington refers to as ‘pro-Russian separatist’ rebels and Kiev’s Western-backed Ukrainian armed forces in the wake of MH17′s downing – the third such ceasefire proposal which Washington has worked hard to undermine, preferring to politically and financially fuel the Ukrainian civil war from the outside.

    Saturday, 19 July 2014

    MH17 - a false flag inside job to falsely accuse Putin & Russia.


    we are unable to publish full articles on the MH17 tragedy yet. Lots of inside info and details coming to us from all angles; substantiating the fact that this is yet another false flag event. Main purpose is to falsely accuse Putin and Russia. The evidence we will be presenting speak for themselves.

    We will be adding significant digested data and illustration as and when they have been double-checked and compiled. Please bear with us and watch this page as we add more irrefutable evidence of this inside job.

    MH17-9M-MRO and MH370-9M-MRD confuse-switcheroo distraction.

    Never before in the history of airline crashes, have so many uncommon "mistakes / coincidences" originated from a common source that points the finger back to the perpetrators of the crimes of mass destruction. Those culprits now stand as naked as the "emperor who wore no clothes".  

    Only a vaporised air crash would need a staged crash scene.

    Planned years ago, MH17 was a set-up to frame Putin & Russia at the right time when the right "willing" victim (MAS) comes along. While it is possible to set up a false flag frame-up with an unwilling victim, the risk of accidental exposure is too high to even consider. It is a fact that Titanic, 911, TWA-800, Lockerbie, AF447, MH370 all involved complicit govts, korporats (shipping lines, airlines, insurance) and regulators.

    Who had control of the Ukrainian airspace to guide flight MH17 to the preplanned flight path to disaster, Zone 1?  It is a fact that MH17 was heading 108.5 deg; about 5 km too far NE of the staged crash site at Hrabove. An over-correction made between 1:15 to 1:17pm, ended up with the "mistake flight path of 117.71 deg" heading towards the densely populated town of Snizhne (Zone 2).  While the perpetrators of this CMD (Crime of Mass Destruction) could not care less about the local populace casualties, they do worry the reported local casualties could inadvertently expose their crime to frame up Putin & Russia. That would defeat the no. 1 objective.

    While they could choose to shoot down MH17 with a BUK missile and blame it on Russia, it would all come to naught if the dispersion pattern of the plane debris, indicates where the missile were shot from. Staging the crash sites would not work (with a missile shoot down) since the actual crash pattern would have overwhelmed the rather constrained limited staged crash pattern. Worse, the staged crash sites would definitely point "fingers" back at the US & their Nazis Ukrainian minions.

    A better plot would be: To openly accuse Russia and Putin of supporting the pro-Russian Federalists and providing the BUK missiles in the shoot down while they secretly vaporise MH17 completely. The few remnant debris from MH17 can be covertly collected and replanted in the forested or open fields NW of Zone 1. That way there would be no possibility of 2 crash pattern.

    Even then, the risk of stray debris falling into the densely populated zone 2 (in the direct path of 117 deg) was deemed to high. Thus, before complete disintegration, the plane was diverted more than 30 deg by directing the DEW Laser beam at the tail section first. This is the hallmark of DEW Laser weaponry. And when the partially vaporised plane (more like a projectile) was in the desired course (towards zone 3), beam intensity / power were increased to complete the vaporisation process.

    Needless to say, a vaporised (even 70-80%) plane crash would not even look like a normal plane crash with absence of bodies (almost all of the 298 passengers & crew would be vaporised first) and 70-80% of the plane's contents, engines and fuselage. Therefore, dead bodies, jet engines, parts of MH370 fuselage (alpha MRO repainted as MRD) which were salvaged in the real crash sites at South China Sea, Offshore Vietnam, piles of expected air crash luggage and cargoes, had to be brought in covertly in the nights before the scheduled crash. Obviously, too a bomb would be detonated in ASCS1 (to simulate the engine crash and explosion) at a scheduled time. This was of course captured in a video shown by CNN, ABC and all of the KABAL bought MSM presstitutes.

    "Absolute proof" of 9M-MRC debunked in seconds.

    The staged crash sites are littered with all "MRD" debris (or shall we say "MRO" repainted as "MRD"). They had 4 months to do this. Then take a photo of MH17 9M-MRD on one of the earlier flights, photoshop (or more precisely, cut the D in the centre, smudge it a little and voila! you have a new twitter-FB hoax - distraction to add to the main false flag event). It's that simple. Takes less than a minute to change.

    Last time we checked,there tens of thousands of gullibles sharing and retweeting it. Naturally, the bought MSM presstitutes and their schills will be gleefully and knowingly promoting this prank. The biggest lie is sometimes the simplest.

    See how the youtube and MSM media spins and promote the Cor Pan prank. Let see how many still leave them online after this debunk.
    Cor Pan posted the following image from Amsterdam's Schipol airport moments before the flight took off at 12:15 pm local time. The caption reads: "If it disappears, this is what it looks like," an apparent reference to the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines flight 370 in March.

    In a reference to the disappearance of flight MH370 in March, Cor Pan, believed to be shown in this profile picture, posted a picture, right, on his Facebook page with the message: "If the plane disappears, this is what it looks like."

    Engine size at staged crash site (Hrabovo) does not match the standard Boeing 777 engine. 

    Fabricated "hard" evidence by FT created on 1 June, revised wreck 4 July, published 21 July.

    Don't the FT presstitutes check their sources before publishing on 21 July?  Incidentally, this propaganda piece was created on  1 June 2014 and revised on 4 July 2014, 13 days before MH17 was purportedly shot by a missile. One wonders when was this "hard evidence" fabricated?

    Fabricated "hard" wreck confirm planted evidence, staged crash sites, prepared propaganda BS, preplanned speeches (blow jobs) by blackmailed western leaders & whores of mass deception (WMDs).....all out of sync, time & space with reality & real forensic evidence.

    KZB's objective: Blame Putin & Russia, instigate WWIII

    Confirmed: MH370 and MH17 were both vaporised by US DEW Laser weaponry. 
    The real reason why corpses long dead, small size jet turbines and MH370 debris were used to stage the Planted Crash Scenes (PCS) at Hrabovo.

    Unfortunately (for them), the Last Radar Contact (LRC) was at 1:20pm, more than 5 km south of Hrabovo PCS confirmed by AirbusDS satellite photos.

    You can fool most people most of the time but you can never cheat real forensic physics.

    Planted crash scene confirmed by Airbus satellite photos & laws of physics. 

    Why is there a need for a Planted Crash Scene?

    Because it was not a missile that shot down MH17. If missiles had been used, they were only for show (deception). Like MH370, MH17 was vaporised by a DEW laser weapon. It would have been very, very strange indeed to have a crash site with little debris and no organic (body parts) and other easily vaporised materials. That is why isolated intact corpses (reportedly days old) and pieces of MH370 fuselage (picked up on 8 March 2014 in the South China Sea) were dropped at around the targeted crash zone. Unfortunately for the schemers, many of the planted debris fell short (by a few km) from the actual crash location of the most resistant parts of the plane (ie the titanium jet engines). Fakes cannot be as good as the genuine.

    Notice too, the easy to remember repeated nos in the planned accident (hallmark of false flag covert ops).
    At 1:17pm the plane changed course to 117.71 degrees. Remote controlled to steer MH17 plane to the designated "missile hit" location.

    At 1:19pm (911 reverse) the distance to the planned "missile hit" at 1:20 pm, was 11.7 km.
    With such precise timing and targeted distances/course, how can this not be an inside job?

    Clipped Invalid M'sian passport suggests planted evidence at MH17 crash scene.

    Malaysian Airlines MH17 - Something Stinks

    Something Stinks in this Malaysian Airlines MH17 Attack and it's not the smell of decomposed bodies that were dead well before this event. Is it a coincidence that 2 of histories major airplane disasters happen within a few months and involves the same Airline?
    2 MAS crashes before and after Obama's visit. Najib visited the US and had the most number of personal contacts with the siting POTUS than any other M'sian PM. So either Obama or Najib is jinxed.


    Despite angry denials by Malaysian government and airline authorities that MH17 pilots had asked to alter their flight path to avoid danger, details have emerged, showing there may be more than meets the eye.

    According to well-placed Malaysia Airlines sources, at least two cabin crew swapped shifts so they would not be on MH17, specifically because they were worried about the flightpath. UK tabloid, The Mail on Sunday, was told that worried MH17 pilots consulted air traffic controllers in Malaysia and also made an informal approach to the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO). But still Malaysia Airlines did not divert the route, unlike other carriers.

    The latest allegations in the foreign media plunges Malaysian authorities into further disrepute especially after new Transport Minister Liow Tiong Lai was caught bending the truth when he insisted the flight path used was safe and implied it had been cleared by the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO). In an immediate rebuttal, the ICAO made it clear it "does not declare airspace safe or unsafe or undertake any other direct operational responsibilities with respect to civilian air services."

    Full article:
    Follow us: @MsiaChronicle on Twitter

    At least we now know,  that safety was not MAS priority. The excuse of cutting cost (flight distance) is a bullshit excuse to cover the real hidden agenda.

    Flight path deviation in the last 5 minutes before the main explosion (hit by missile) at 1:20 pm 13km from crash site. The actual crash site was 30 deg off the straight line trajectory of the plane. Dead bodies and pieces of the planes were found  at villages in Rozsypne and Hrabove; at least, 30 seconds or about 5km before the last contact at 1:20pm. This means the plane was disintegrating and dropping body parts 5km before the purported "missile hit" explosion point. How can this be?

    Journalists are supposed to report the tragedy after it has occurred. But this predictive reporting by FT proves that MSM presstitution is alive and kicking. CNN was also caught creating the stories on MH370 tragedy, at least 7 hours before the plane even left the airport.